San Antonio Spurs vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Wembanyama’s 40-Point Masterclass Leads Spurs to Blowout Victory
The San Antonio Spurs delivered a statement performance on February 10, 2026, dismantling the Los Angeles Lakers 136-108 at Crypto.com Arena in front of 18,997 fans. This wasn’t just another regular-season win—it was a complete offensive clinic that showcased exactly why the Spurs have emerged as one of the Western Conference’s elite teams.
From the opening tip, San Antonio imposed their will on both ends of the floor. Victor Wembanyama erupted for a game-high 40 points on an efficient 13-of-20 shooting, while the Spurs’ ball movement carved up the Lakers’ defense for 34 assists on 52 made field goals. The 28-point margin marked San Antonio’s most dominant performance against Los Angeles this season, improving their series record to 3-1.
| Information | Match Details |
|---|---|
| Event | NBA Regular Season 2025-26 |
| Game | San Antonio Spurs vs Los Angeles Lakers |
| Date | February 10, 2026 |
| Venue | Crypto.com Arena, Los Angeles, CA |
| Attendance | 18,997 |
| Winner | San Antonio Spurs |
| Final Score | 136-108 |
| Broadcast | ESPN / NBA League Pass |
Core Match Statistics Overview
The box score tells a clear story: San Antonio dominated in virtually every meaningful statistical category. Their 56.5% field goal percentage dwarfed the Lakers’ 48.2%, and the Spurs’ defensive pressure forced 18 Lakers turnovers while committing just 13 themselves.
| Team Metric | San Antonio Spurs | Los Angeles Lakers |
|---|---|---|
| Field Goals % | 56.5% (52-92) | 48.2% (41-85) |
| 3PT % | 39.4% (13-33) | 44.0% (11-25) |
| Free Throws % | 76.0% (19-25) | 75.0% (15-20) |
| Total Rebounds | 45 | 34 |
| Assists | 34 | 23 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 18 |
| Steals | 14 | 7 |
| Blocks | 6 | 2 |
| Points in Paint | 62 | 48 |
| Fast Break Points | 24 | 14 |
Three-Point Shooting
The Lakers actually shot a higher percentage from beyond the arc (44.0% vs 39.4%), but the Spurs attempted and made more triples overall. Several players contributed to San Antonio’s 13 three-pointers, which kept the Lakers’ defense dispersed throughout the game.
Ball Movement and Playmaking
The game was really won here.The Spurs’ 34 assists on 52 made baskets represent an exceptional 65.4% assist rate—meaning nearly two-thirds of their field goals came directly from a teammate’s pass. De’Aaron Fox orchestrated the offense with six assists in just 17 minutes, while Dylan Harper added six more off the bench.
Rebounding Dominance
San Antonio’s 45-34 rebounding advantage, including a decisive 9-5 edge on the offensive glass, created second-chance opportunities and limited the Lakers’ transition game. Wembanyama’s 12 rebounds led all players, with Luke Kornet grabbing five in just 10 minutes of action.
Turnover Battle
The Spurs forced 18 Lakers turnovers and converted them into 26 points. Their active hands—14 steals as a team—disrupted Los Angeles’ offensive flow from the opening quarter and never let the Lakers establish any rhythm.
Period-by-Period Analysis
| Quarter | San Antonio Spurs | Los Angeles Lakers |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | 47 | 30 |
| 2nd | 37 | 25 |
| 3rd | 31 | 26 |
| 4th | 21 | 27 |
First Quarter — Spurs Explode for 47 Points: San Antonio came out firing on all cylinders, shooting an astonishing 18-of-27 from the field (66.7%) in the opening period. Wembanyama was unstoppable, scoring 19 first-quarter points on 8-of-9 shooting, including 3-of-4 from three-point range. The Spurs’ 17-point lead after 12 minutes set the tone for the entire game.
Second Quarter — Lakers’ Defense Cracks: Los Angeles tried to adjust defensively, but San Antonio’s ball movement continued to find open looks. At the break, the Spurs led 84-55 after dropping an additional 37 points.De’Aaron Fox and Dylan Harper combined for 10 first-half assists, repeatedly breaking down the Lakers’ pick-and-roll coverage.
Third Quarter — Lakers Show Fight: Los Angeles finally found some offensive rhythm, outscoring the Spurs 26-31 in the third. Jaxson Hayes provided a spark with 13 points on 6-of-7 shooting, but every Lakers run was met with a Spurs response. San Antonio’s lead remained insurmountable at 115-81 entering the final frame.
Fourth Quarter — Garbage Time: With the game well in hand, both teams emptied their benches. The Lakers outscored the Spurs 27-21 in the fourth, but the outcome was never in doubt. San Antonio cruised to their 62nd win of the season.
San Antonio Spurs Player Statistics
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor Wembanyama | 26:06 | 40 | 13-20 | 4-6 | 10-12 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | +22 |
| Devin Vassell | 24:10 | 9 | 4-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +20 |
| Julian Champagnie | 18:09 | 8 | 2-7 | 1-5 | 3-4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +14 |
| De’Aaron Fox | 17:12 | 8 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +30 |
| Dylan Harper | 27:15 | 15 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +27 |
Victor Wembanyama delivered one of the most efficient performances of his young career. His 40 points came in just 26 minutes, posting a Game Score of 33.7—the highest of any player on the floor. The 7-foot-4 phenom was virtually unguardable, hitting mid-range jumpers, finishing at the rim, and knocking down four triples. His plus-minus of +22 reflected his immense impact on both ends.
Dylan Harper provided a massive spark off the bench, scoring 15 points on 6-of-8 shooting while dishing out six assists. The rookie guard’s poise and playmaking ability have been a revelation for San Antonio’s second unit.
De’Aaron Fox may have scored only eight points, but his fingerprints were all over this victory. In just 17 minutes, he recorded six assists, two steals, and a block while posting a team-best +30 plus-minus. Fox’s tempo-pushing and defensive activity set the table for San Antonio’s offensive explosion.
Carter Bryant scored 16 points, including three triples, on 6-of-12 shooting.The forward’s floor-spacing and defensive versatility made him a perfect fit alongside Wembanyama in the frontcourt.
Los Angeles Lakers Player Statistics
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luke Kennard | 27:40 | 14 | 5-8 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -20 |
| Rui Hachimura | 26:35 | 6 | 3-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -24 |
| Jaxson Hayes | 16:38 | 13 | 6-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -16 |
| Bronny James | 25:22 | 12 | 5-10 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -6 |
| Drew Timme | 20:29 | 14 | 5-8 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -4 |
Luke Kennard was the Lakers’ most consistent offensive threat, scoring 14 points on 5-of-8 shooting while adding five assists. However, his -20 plus-minus underscores how ineffective Los Angeles was when he wasn’t on the floor.
Jaxson Hayes provided energy off the bench with 13 points on near-perfect 6-of-7 shooting. His activity around the rim was a rare bright spot for a Lakers team that struggled to generate consistent offense.
Bronny James showed flashes of his potential, posting 12 points, six assists, and three rebounds in 25 minutes. His two made three-pointers and ability to push the pace gave the Lakers some life, but his defensive limitations were exposed against San Antonio’s dynamic backcourt.
Rui Hachimura endured a nightmare shooting night, connecting on just 3-of-12 attempts and missing all three of his three-point tries. The Lakers needed more from their starting forward, and his -24 plus-minus was the worst among starters.
Statistical Leaders Summary Table
| Category | San Antonio Spurs | Los Angeles Lakers |
|---|---|---|
| Leading Scorer | Victor Wembanyama (40) | Luke Kennard (14) |
| Second Leading Scorer | Carter Bryant (16) | Drew Timme (14) |
| Top Rebounder | Victor Wembanyama (12) | Rui Hachimura (4) |
| Most Assists | De’Aaron Fox / Dylan Harper (6) | Bronny James (6) |
Analytical Breakdowns
Why San Antonio Won
Balanced Offensive Production
The Spurs’ scoring distribution was a nightmare for the Lakers to defend. Seven different San Antonio players scored at least eight points, with four reaching double figures. Wembanyama’s 40 points commanded defensive attention, but Harper (15), Bryant (16), Barnes (11), and Vassell (9) all made the Lakers pay for doubling the big man.
| Scoring Breakdown | Spurs | Lakers |
|---|---|---|
| Points in Paint | 62 | 48 |
| Second Chance Points | 12 | 6 |
| Bench Points | 62 | 62 |
Elite Transition Defense
San Antonio’s 14 steals led to 26 fast-break points, while the Lakers managed just 14 fast-break points on seven steals. The Spurs’ guards constantly pressured the Lakers’ ball-handlers, forcing rushed decisions and live-ball turnovers that turned into easy run-outs.
Unselfish Basketball
The Spurs’ 34 assists on 52 made baskets represented an assist rate of 65.4%. This wasn’t isolation basketball—it was a symphony of ball movement, player movement, and hockey assists that the Lakers simply couldn’t contain.
Why Los Angeles Lost
Heavy Dependence on Role Players
Without their primary offensive creators available, the Lakers lacked a go-to scorer capable of matching Wembanyama’s production. Kennard (14 points) and Timme (14 points) led the team in scoring—a telling statistic for a Lakers team that expects star-level production from its rotation.
| Offensive Production | Lakers |
|---|---|
| Points from Starters | 50 |
| Points from Bench | 58 |
| Field Goals Made | 41 |
| Assists | 23 |
Turnover Epidemic
The Lakers committed 18 turnovers, leading directly to 26 Spurs points. Los Angeles’ ball-handlers struggled against San Antonio’s aggressive on-ball pressure, with multiple players recording multiple turnovers. These live-ball turnovers killed any momentum the Lakers tried to build.
Rebounding Deficit
The Lakers were out-rebounded 45-34, including a 9-5 disadvantage on offensive boards. San Antonio’s size advantage—led by Wembanyama’s 12 rebounds—allowed the Spurs to control the glass and limit Los Angeles to one shot per possession.
Poor Shooting from Starters
The Lakers’ starting lineup combined for just 50 points on 19-of-46 shooting (41.3%). Hachimura (3-12), Bufkin (2-10), and LaRavia (3-6) all struggled to generate efficient offense, putting too much pressure on the bench to carry the scoring load.
Historical Context & Advanced Insights
Season Series Breakdown
| Date | Result | Score | Venue |
|---|---|---|---|
| November 5, 2025 | Lakers Win | 119-118 | Crypto.com Arena |
| December 10, 2025 | Spurs Win | 132-119 | Crypto.com Arena |
| January 7, 2026 | Spurs Win | 107-91 | Frost Bank Center |
| February 10, 2026 | Spurs Win | 136-108 | Crypto.com Arena |
The Spurs have now won three straight against the Lakers after dropping the season opener by a single point. San Antonio’s average margin of victory in those three wins is 19 points, demonstrating their growing dominance in this rivalry.
Advanced Statistical Insights
Assist-to-Field-Goal Ratio: The Spurs’ 34 assists on 52 makes (65.4%) dwarfed the Lakers’ 23 assists on 41 makes (56.1%). This suggests San Antonio’s offense was far more collaborative and less predictable, making it harder for the Lakers’ defense to load up on any single player.
Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%): San Antonio posted a staggering .636 eFG%, compared to the Lakers’ .547. Wembanyama’s efficiency (13-20, 4-6 from three) was a major driver, but the Spurs’ overall shot selection—heavily weighted toward high-percentage looks at the rim and open threes—made the difference.
Offensive Rating: The Spurs’ 129.4 offensive rating was exceptional, while the Lakers managed just 102.8. For context, the league average offensive rating in 2025-26 hovered around 114. San Antonio’s performance was elite by any measure.
Points Per Possession: San Antonio scored 1.294 points per possession, while Los Angeles managed just 1.028. The Spurs’ ability to score efficiently in the half-court while also generating transition opportunities created an unsustainable gap that the Lakers never threatened.
Game Implications & Key Lessons
What This Means for San Antonio
- Statement Win: This 28-point victory over a conference rival reinforces San Antonio’s status as a legitimate championship contender. The Spurs improved to 62-20 on the season, sitting second in the Western Conference.
- Bench Depth: The Spurs’ bench outscored the Lakers’ bench 62-58, with Harper, Bryant, and Johnson providing consistent production. This depth will be crucial in a seven-game playoff series.
- Wembanyama’s Ceiling: When Wembanyama is this efficient and dominant, the Spurs are nearly impossible to beat. His ability to score from all three levels while anchoring the defense makes him the most impactful player on the floor every night.
What This Means for Los Angeles
- Defensive Rebuilding: The Lakers’ defense has been a recurring issue all season, and allowing 136 points at home is a massive red flag. They must find solutions to contain elite offensive teams.
- Turnover Correction: Eighteen turnovers is simply unacceptable. The Lakers need to prioritize ball security and make better decisions in traffic.
- Consistency from Starters: The Lakers’ starting unit cannot afford performances like this—50 combined points on 41% shooting won’t beat any playoff-caliber team.
Key Lessons
- Transition Defense Matters: San Antonio’s 14 steals and 24 fast-break points were the direct result of aggressive, disciplined on-ball pressure. Teams that force turnovers and run win games.
- Ball Movement Beats Isolation: The Spurs’ 34 assists show that sharing the ball creates higher-quality shots and makes defenses work harder.
- Rebounding is Non-Negotiable: A 45-34 rebounding deficit put the Lakers in a constant hole. Controlling the glass gives you extra possessions and limits opponent second-chance opportunities.
- Star Power Needs Support: Wembanyama’s 40 points were impactful, but the Spurs’ role players (Harper, Bryant, Barnes) stepped up when needed. Championship teams need contributions from everyone.
- Turnovers Are Momentum Killers: Every Lakers turnover seemed to lead to a Spurs basket. Protecting the ball is the simplest way to stay competitive.
- Home Court Isn’t Enough: The Lakers had the home crowd behind them, but San Antonio’s execution was so precise that venue became irrelevant.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the San Antonio Spurs vs Lakers game on February 10, 2026?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Los Angeles Lakers 136-108 at Crypto.com Arena. The win improved the Spurs’ season record to 62-20 and gave them a 3-1 series lead over the Lakers.
What were Victor Wembanyama’s stats against the Lakers?
Victor Wembanyama finished with 40 points, 12 rebounds, 2 assists, 2 steals, and 1 block in just 26 minutes of action. He shot 13-of-20 from the field, 4-of-6 from three-point range, and 10-of-12 from the free-throw line.
Who was the Lakers’ top scorer?
Luke Kennard led the Lakers with 14 points on 5-of-8 shooting, while Drew Timme also contributed 14 points off the bench.
What was the Spurs’ shooting percentage in the game?
The Spurs shot 56.5% from the field (52-of-92) and 39.4% from three-point range (13-of-33). They also made 19-of-25 free throws (76.0%).
How many assists did the Spurs record?
The Spurs recorded 34 assists on 52 made field goals, an assist rate of 65.4%. De’Aaron Fox and Dylan Harper each contributed six assists.
What was the Lakers’ turnover total?
The Lakers committed 18 turnovers, which the Spurs converted into 26 points. Luke Kennard was the only Lakers starter with fewer than two turnovers.
Where can I find the full San Antonio Spurs vs Lakers box score?
Complete box score data is available on Basketball-Reference.com, ESPN.com, and the official NBA statistics portal.
Conclusion
The San Antonio Spurs’ 136-108 demolition of the Los Angeles Lakers was a masterclass in efficiency, teamwork, and defensive intensity. Victor Wembanyama’s 40-point masterpiece grabbed the headlines, but the underlying statistics tell a more complete story: 34 assists, 14 steals, a 45-34 rebounding advantage, and just 13 turnovers. San Antonio played the kind of connected, unselfish basketball that wins championships, while the Lakers’ 18 turnovers and 41.3% shooting from their starters exposed deep structural issues.
For the Spurs, this victory cements their place among the Western Conference elite and showcases a roster built for playoff success. For the Lakers, the path forward requires honest self-assessment—particularly on the defensive end and in the turnover department. When efficiency meets execution, the scoreboard reflects the gap. On this night in Los Angeles, that gap was 28 points and growing.
